The IRB Rugby Sevens World Cup was held in Dubai in March 2009 at ‘The Sevens’ stadium, a new sports complex built in just a year. The event attracted more than 100,000 visitors over three days. Mercator provided all permanent and temporary IT infrastructure in the stadium, including supporting RNS areas, the Media Room, Photographers Room, Judicial areas and Tournament offices.
As organisations determine their ERP strategy, however, they need to choose the right ERP vendor partner. This white paper explores the plusses and minuses of the four types of ERP partners: Partner ecosystems, frameworks, best-of-breed packages and end-to-end integrated solutions. Only with the right ERP partner can organisations ensure that they obtain the functionality that drives competitive advantage for the optimal total cost of ownership. Go to the resource centre
Featured Resource Center - sponsor
Sponsored By
Featured White Paper
Today, IT organisations face unprecedented challenges. The move to next-generation data centers entails afundamental shift in perspective. Your organisation needs a business-centered view of your data center. HP Data Center Transformation solutions enable this shift in focus.
Implementing Oracle RAC using the HP BladeSystem c-Class with HP Integrity server blades?BL870c and BL860c?running HP-UX can help you build a scalable and flexible SAP application environment.
Linux compute clusters running on an HP BladeSystem infrastructure provide an open source environment that is flexible, cost effective, highly scalable, and reliable.
Your business is dynamic. Faced with unpredictable market pressures and limited resources, you must lower your costs, accelerate growth, and mitigate risks, if you are to sustain a competitive advantage. Virtualisation involves pooling and sharing IT resources, so IT supply automatically meets business demands.
The CIO paradox is a set of pernicious contradictions that permeate the core of your role. We need to make that paradox a thing of the past. To be sure, what I propose is a marathon, not a sprint. The paradox has been around since the dawn of IT. But by using professional associations, forums and events, you can put together a long-term plan of attack. If you do nothing, these contradictions will continue to undercut you and block your successor's path to the Future-State CIO.
The first step is taking the CIO paradox from an amorphous notion to a framework we can use to generate understanding. The common contradictions listed below were culled from my conversations with CIOs over the past 12 months. Grouped into four categories, they constitute a well-defined target at which you can take aim.
* You were hired to be strategic, but you are forced to spend most of your time on operational issues.
* You are the steward of risk mitigation and cost containment, yet you are expected to innovate.
* Your function is seen as that of an enabler, yet you are also expected to be a business driver.
* IT can make or break a company, but you are not a member of the corporate board.
"CIOs must look at risk with a pragmatic lens, which is sometimes viewed as contrary to creativity and innovation," says Maurizio Laudisa, CIO of LifeLabs. "The cost of artistic creativity is often complexity and error; our delivery mandate can afford neither of those."
Your stakeholders
* You run one of the most pervasive, critical functions, yet you must prove your value constantly.
* Your many successes are invisible; your few mistakes are highly visible.
* You are intimately involved in every facet of the business, yet you are considered separate and removed from it.
* You are accountable for project success, but the business has ownership.
"It's one of those 'You have to but you can't' situations," says David Hartley, CIO of Arch Coal (ACI), "How do you insert yourself into the business and drive something you cant really own? If you drive it yourself, people will say, 'Why is this guy doing things to us?' "
Your organisation
* Your staff loves technology but must embrace business to advance.
* Your team members are uncomfortable with people, but to succeed they must build relationships and influence others.
* You develop successors, yet the CEO almost always goes outside for the next CIO.
* You are forced to seek cheap overseas sourcing, yet you are expected to ensure the profession's development at home.
Your industry
* Technology takes a long time to implement, yet your tool set changes constantly.
* Technology is a longterm investment, but the company thinks in quarters.
* Your tools cost a fortune, yet have the highest defect rate of any product.
* You sign vendors' checks, yet they try their darndest to sell to your business peers.
What else needs to be on this list? What resonates most? How are you making progress on these issues?
Martha Heller is managing director of the IT Leadership Practice at ZRG Partners, an executive recruiting firm, and a cofounder of the CIO Executive Council. She can be reached at
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Have you seen the latest issue of Computer News Middle East? Print copies are available exclusively to C-level executives. If you would like to register to receive your free copy, please
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
The CIO paradox is a set of pernicious contradictions that permeate the core of your role. We need to make that paradox a thing of the past. To be sure, what I propose is a marathon, not a sprint. The paradox has been around since the dawn of IT. But by using professional associations, forums and events, you can put together a long-term plan of attack. If you do nothing, these contradictions will continue to undercut you and block your successor's path to the Future-State CIO.
Subscribe to this comment's feed
